I was interviewing a client’s customer a few days ago for a persona project and something he said made me stop and think. What he said can be paraphrased as:
If there is no buzz about your company online, I won’t consider your product as a viable choice.
For context, this is a B2B SaaS product. It plays a key role in a complex workflow. He also says he reads white papers, does his due diligence, looks for facts and data to back up company claims, and talks to vendors. However, he was adamant that the last straw would be if he couldn’t find people talking about the product/solution online. If there was no customer advocacy, he’d walk away.
I’m starting to hear more and more of this type of sentiment. However, this is the first time I’ve heard it said at this level of importance to the decision being made. There was no wavering, no doubt on his side that it was a deciding factor.
Sure, I’ve heard customers say that case studies and testimonials are important. So is talking to customers to hear the reality from them personally. But what was important to this customer was the holistic sharing of advocacy for a product via online means—whether social platforms, self-motivated testimonials or reviews or some form of organic expression or dialogue about the product and company.
His rationale was focused deeply on the need for transparency—which is also entrenched in his company’s culture. In his opinion, the world is now digital and if your company and product have no online conversation and customer advocacy taking place, there’s something amiss.
When I think back to what I hear a lot from customers during persona project interviews, there are a lot of cultural references. Things like:
- We chose [the vendor] because they really seemed to “get” us
- [The vendor] made us feel like a big fish in a small pond – that we’re important to them
- [The vendor] was willing to put skin in the game
Yes, those cliché’s are alive and well.
If I have to make an educated guess, here’s where I think this shift is coming from. Research on buyer content preferences has found the same complaints for years. Take a look at the last three years of research from DemandGen Report’s B2B Content Preferences Surveys:
In 2015, the top suggested improvements to content:
- Use more data and research to support content
- Curb the sales messaging
- Add more insight from industry thought leaders/analysts
- Provide more benchmarking data
- Make content easier to access (shorter lead gen forms)
And – 94% of respondents gave the most credence to peer reviews and user-generated content. While the percentage wasn’t quoted, a high majority of buyers were only somewhat willing to say vendor content was trustworthy.
In 2016, the top suggested improvements to content:
- Use more data and research to support content
- Curb the sales messaging
- Add more insight from industry thought leaders/analysts
- Provide more benchmarking data
- Make content easier to access (shorter lead gen forms)
And 100% of respondents place a higher emphasis on the trustworthiness of the source, while 83% are overwhelmed with the amount of content available.
Surprisingly, 95% of respondents were open to considering vendor content as trustworthy.
In 2017, the top suggestions for improvement to content:
- Use more data and research to support content
- Curb the sales messaging
- Make content easier to access (shorter lead gen forms)
- Provide more benchmarking data
- Add more insight from industry thought leaders/analysts
And – 68% of respondents gave more credence to peer reviews and user-generated content, but 87% of buyers give more credence to industry influencer content.
This year, 75% of respondents placed a higher emphasis on the trustworthiness of the source, but the willingness of buyers to consider vendor content as trustworthy dropped to a low of 34%.
Do you see an alarming, persistent trend here?
B2B Buyers Will Change if Marketers Don’t
Aside from the anomaly of willingness to consider vendor content trustworthy in 2016, the improvements buyers have been asking for in content have remained the same. For three years in a row. And despite the effort B2B marketers are making to roll out more and more content, the impact it’s having with buyers isn’t stellar—in most cases.
This is why they’re looking beyond you to what your customers and peers are saying about you. To guard against the pitches and company-focused chest thumping, buyers are finding ways to plow through the company-generated noise to find level ground. They’re getting smarter about evaluating trustworthiness and more demanding about meaning, purpose and experiences.
I guess what makes me scratch my head is why we’re not changing the way we approach content, as well as how we can improve our brand and customer advocacy programs?
Beatrice McGraw says
The people who are connected with B2B industry must follow these rules. By implementing these rules you will see a major positive impact on your business.
Rachel says
I have just found your website and am really excited about the information I am finding here – love your succinctness. One thing I think is what is an example of a user-generated (ie end customer) content be and where would it go without being connected to the business (linkedin?)? Additionally, how would you get your clients (busy business people) to do this? Thanks!
Ardath Albee says
Hi Rachel,
Thanks!
In answer to your question, think about the growth in review sites like G2Crowd. And yes, it could be social media posting, as well. It could be a video interview with a customer, even though that’s company produced, for the customer to go on record is also important.
For LinkedIn, think about someone from the company writing a post on Pulse and then getting comments from others – some customers, some not – this can also work.
I find that if you ask your customers to post a review or contribute in some way, many of them will.